SPECIALS
>> Plenary events
>
Lectures
> Paper sessions
> Kossok lectures
> Others
>>
Opening
>> Cultural & social
programme
>> Doctoral seminar
|
PLENARY LECTURES
Overview
Plenary
keynote lectures are scheduled as follows:
Friday, 19
September 2014, 4:15pm, HS 33, university main building:
>> Plenary
lecture I by Wolfgang Schmale
Saturday,
20 September 2014, 6pm HS 33, university main building:
>> Plenary
lecture II by Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch
Sunday, 21
September 2014, 6pm, HS 33, university main building:
>> Plenary lecture III by Paul E.
Lovejoy
Monday, 22
September 2014, 10am, Großer Festsaal, university main building:
>> Closing
lecture by Immanuel Wallerstein
>> Conference schedule
>> Conference programme
Keynote
speakers & abstracts
We are
delighted to announce details of our keynote speakers giving plenary lectures
at the conference.
|
Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch
Professor
emerita of modern African History,
University
Paris 7 Denis Diderot (France):
From Vienna (1815) to Berlin
(1885).
The end of the former empire.
Plenary
lecture on Saturday 20 September, 6pm
HS 33,
University of Vienna (main building)
The
Vienna Conference was the apex of British imperial hegemony aiming at
imposing its rule on Europe, noticeably by forbidding other powers (and
above all France) to practice the Atlantic slave trade. Notwithstanding, it
exacerbated European nationalisms. So doing, it was also the end of an
epoch. All over the 19th century, the rise of capitalism among competing
Western colonial powers will impose new types of agreements. Vienna (1815)
was the last conference aiming at ending a European war. The next to come
would be Berlin (1885) aiming at avoiding European wars, i.e. prefigurating
a building of Europe.
|
|
Paul E.
Lovejoy
Distinguished
Research Professor (Canada Research Chair in African Diaspora History),
Department of History, York University (Toronto, Canada):
The jihad movement in West
Africa in the context
of the Congress of Vienna
Plenary
lecture on Sunday 21 September, 6pm
HS 33,
University of Vienna (main building)
The
monumental shifts in power relationships that followed the defeat of
Napolean and the emergence of independent states in the Americas occurred
at the same time as the jihad movement in West Africa achieved a new level
of militancy. By 1815, jihad had become the dominant force in the interior
of West Africa, with the result that virtually all of the major states and
most of the minor polities from Senegambia to Lake Chad had been overthrown
or subjected to extensive reform. Yet the conservative reaction to
revolution in Europe and the emergence of independent states in Haiti,
Brazil and virtually everywhere in Hispanic America, except Cuba and Puerto
Rico, is perceived within a Eurocentric perspective that ignores what was
happening in West Africa, and indeed in other parts of Africa, too. It is
argued in this paper that the conception of the "Atlantic World"
has to be redefined so as to include the African shores of the Atlantic
Ocean. The challenge is to understand the virtual isolation of the Islamic
world from the analysis of the Black Atlantic, including the independence
of new countries, slave resistance in the Americas, and the transformation
of West Africa into a stronghold of Muslim governance. The paper calls for
a different, multi-perspective approach to the so-called "Age of
Revolutions" that has dominated the analysis of the history of Europe
and the Americas.
|
|
Wolfgang
Schmale
Professor
of Modern History,
Institute
of History, University of Vienna (Austria):
The Holy Alliance and the Rise
of Christian Imperialism
Plenary lecture
on Friday 19 September, 4:15pm
HS 33,
University of Vienna (main building)
When
answering questions about the origins of Christian imperialism, reference
is usually made to the development of the missionary movement in the nineteenth
century, which distinguished itself markedly from the practices and
objectives of early-modern missions. In connection with possible
trajectories established during what Reinhart Koselleck termed the
“Sattelzeit” – or in more neutral terms the transitional period around 1800
between the early-modern and modern eras – I find it illuminating to direct
a “penetrating” gaze upon the Holy Alliance, which may have functioned as a
catalyst for a form of Christian imperialism.
At the
very least, one must acknowledge that the Holy Alliance was perceived and
discussed far beyond Europe as a potential actor. Czar Alexander, the
spiritus rector of the Holy Alliance, saw to this himself. First, he would
have liked to gain the United States as a member; second, he worried about
Spain and South America. With regard to South America, the path toward
independence dismayed him less than did the prospect that these new
independent countries might not be monarchies.
Alexander
I opened the way for a form of Christianity that entered into a supportive
partnership not only with politics but also with emerging imperialism. The
latter availed itself of a Christian identity that later with imperialists
like Cecil Rhodes, for example, would take on racist characteristics. The
new understanding of Christendom also had an internal effect, constituting
a connection between individual believers within the various congregations
and imperialism in the world beyond.
|
|
Immanuel
Wallerstein
Professor
emeritus of Sociology, senior research scholar,
Yale
University (New Haven, U.S.A.):
The congress of Vienna. From
1763 to 1833:
Europe and the Americas
Closing
lecture on Monday 22 September, 10am
Großer Festsaal,
University of Vienna (main building)
Public
lecture in the series Vienna Lectures – the dialogue forum of the City of
Vienna
The
Congress of Vienna, which met between September 1814 and June 1815, was
only an event, albeit a very important one, in the longer, wider, and more
important story of how Great Britain obtained, secured, and
institutionalized its hegemony in the world-system. It required Great
Britain to undertake actions at home, on the European continent, in south
Asia, and in particular in the Americas.
The
story begins with the Seven Years' War, which Great Britain won in 1763 and
hoped would mark its definitive defeat of its rival for hegemonic status,
France. It turned out to be only the penultimate moment in that struggle.
France was able to recover sufficiently to force a second round of the
battle, which culminated in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars between
1792 and 1815.
In
between 1763 and 1792, the Thirteen Colonies of British North America
achieved independence. Analogous movements began in Hispanic America,
similar in some but not all respects to the drive in British North America.
With the
defeat of France at Waterloo, Great Britain was able to secure the ouster
not only of France, but of Spain and Portugal, from any significant role in
the Americas. Great Britain could now turn her efforts to containing the
ability of the three great autocratic governments of the European Continent
- Russia, Austria, and Prussia - from succeeding in Metternich's program of
total repression of liberal revolutionary movements. She did this with the
assistance of France as a junior partner in establishing the model of the
liberal states in a privileged economic position in the world-system.
|
>> Commemorative and
opening lectures
>> Plenary paper sessions
>>
Kossok lectures
>> Other plenary events
|